From owner-ssh@clinet.fi  Wed May 30 15:23:10 2001
Received: from smtp1.clinet.fi (smtp1.clinet.fi [194.100.2.57])
	by hutcs.cs.hut.fi (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id PAA08283
	for <ssh-archiver@cs.hut.fi>; Wed, 30 May 2001 15:23:10 +0300 (EET DST)
Received: from mail.clinet.fi (mail.clinet.fi [194.100.0.7])
	by smtp1.clinet.fi (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 6B9522105C; Wed, 30 May 2001 15:23:10 +0300 (EEST)
Received: (from majordom@localhost)
	by mail.clinet.fi (8.9.3/8.9.3) id PAA00723
	for ssh-outgoing; Wed, 30 May 2001 15:00:20 +0300
Received: from imadev.eeg.ccf.org (imadev.eeg.ccf.org [139.137.100.50])
	by mail.clinet.fi (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id PAA00699
	for <ssh@clinet.fi>; Wed, 30 May 2001 15:00:15 +0300
Received: (qmail 21071 invoked by uid 563); 30 May 2001 12:00:11 -0000
Date: Wed, 30 May 2001 08:00:11 -0400
From: Greg Wooledge <wooledg@eeg.ccf.org>
To: "Julius C. Duque" <jcduque@cybercebu.com>
Cc: OpenSSH <ssh@clinet.fi>
Subject: Re: Receiving Signal 11
Message-ID: <20010530080010.N14412@eeg.ccf.org>
References: <20010529080334.J14412@eeg.ccf.org> <Pine.LNX.4.21.0105301040100.16060-100000@marlene.cybercebu.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.21.0105301040100.16060-100000@marlene.cybercebu.com>; from jcduque@cybercebu.com on Wed, May 30, 2001 at 10:40:59AM +0800
Sender: owner-ssh@clinet.fi
Precedence: bulk

On Wed, May 30, 2001 at 10:40:59AM +0800, Julius C. Duque wrote:

> So, am I right in saying that the compiled ssh binary was built
> incorrectly?

That's one possibility.  Another is a bug in OpenSSH.  A third is faulty
RAM.  A fourth is an overheating CPU (possibly due to overclocking).

Without attaching gdb to the ssh and sshd processes and debugging them,
it's probably not possible to guess what's going on.  But perhaps someone
else on the list knows more about your problem.