From owner-ssh@clinet.fi  Thu May 10 21:27:57 2001
Received: from smtp1.clinet.fi (smtp1.clinet.fi [194.100.2.57])
	by hutcs.cs.hut.fi (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id VAA28950
	for <ssh-archiver@cs.hut.fi>; Thu, 10 May 2001 21:27:57 +0300 (EET DST)
Received: from mail.clinet.fi (mail.clinet.fi [194.100.0.7])
	by smtp1.clinet.fi (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 4EA641F72B; Thu, 10 May 2001 21:27:50 +0300 (EEST)
Received: (from majordom@localhost)
	by mail.clinet.fi (8.9.3/8.9.3) id VAA00735
	for ssh-outgoing; Thu, 10 May 2001 21:07:51 +0300
Received: from heneryhawk.csgsystems.com (heneryhawk.csgsystems.com [205.144.146.213])
	by mail.clinet.fi (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id VAA00729
	for <ssh@clinet.fi>; Thu, 10 May 2001 21:07:48 +0300
Received: from foghorn.csgsystems.com (foghorn [205.144.147.166])
	by heneryhawk.csgsystems.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id MAA25626;
	Thu, 10 May 2001 12:06:03 -0600 (MDT)
Received: from csgsystems.com ([205.144.156.112])
	by foghorn.csgsystems.com (8.11.1/8.11.1) with ESMTP id f4AI6LA08362;
	Thu, 10 May 2001 13:06:21 -0500 (CDT)
Message-ID: <3AFAD901.304B57A9@csgsystems.com>
Date: Thu, 10 May 2001 13:08:01 -0500
From: Charles Nelson <charles_nelson@csgsystems.com>
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.5 [en] (WinNT; I)
X-Accept-Language: en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "Stephen Cooke (KN)" <stephen.cooke@telewest.co.uk>
Cc: ssh@clinet.fi
Subject: Re: slow speed transfer using scp vs ftp
References: <D376D4D39642D411B8D20008C7E61B7A8D5776@KN-NW-XCHG-1>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-ssh@clinet.fi
Precedence: bulk

Steve,

I do not know if fast ciphers is a compile option, could you point to
the doc for it.  I have tested ssh240, ssh241, ossh252, and ossh29p1
on sun hardware and they all are slow compared to ftp or rcp.  I did find
that ossh is much faster than ssh.

Chuck Nelson


"Stephen Cooke (KN)" wrote:

> I get very slow data transfer using scp
> compared to ftp of the same networking.
>
> Can I speed this up by re-compiling openssl with fast ciphers or
> is this best done by requesting a fast cipher at the client level.
>
> Or is it something completly different.
> regards
> steve
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> The information transmitted is intended only for the person or entity to which it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged material.
> Statements and opinions expressed in this e-mail may not represent those of the company. Any review, retransmission, dissemination or other use of, or taking of any action in reliance upon, this information by persons or entities other than the intended recipient is prohibited. If you received this in error, please contact the sender immediately and delete the material from any computer.
>
> ==============================================================================

